+ update 2020: WARNING - support of the decompiler is now VERY LIMITED. There are no active developers. This means we will NOT develop new features and/or fix most of bugs. We left the tracker running in case somebody from community would like to work on it. Sorry for the inconvenience.
State: closed new: Initial state. As long as issue is in this state, the work on the issue has not yet begun. opened: Opened state means developer started working on the issue. Feature/Fix will probably be in the next release. postponed: This means developer is not working on it now, for some reason it cannot be implemented now. Issue may be opened again in the future. upgraded: Issue is in upgraded state when developer made changes to the program and new version was released. closed: This means the user is satisfied with issue results and no more changes are needed. invalid: These issues cannot be solved. ignored: Developer decided to take no action on this issue. returned: Program changes were made but user is not satisfied and returned the issue.
> What steps will reproduce the problem?
Open the swf file, navigate to script common.util.Util._$(). (line 307 in the editor) and
let the decompiler decompile the code.
The settings are all default. Turning on and off auto-deobfuscation causes no difference
to the output.
> What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
A simple function decompiles with stray "§§dup"s, see below.
> What version of the product are you using? Is it "nightly build"? Which operating system
do you have?
I am running FFDec_7.1.1 Release .jar file on MacOS (10.11), Java 8 update 65 (Although I
think this problem is not probably related to runtime environment).
> Please provide any additional information below. If the problem is related to a SWF
file, attach it here, otherwise we can't help you.
Hello. When trying to decompile a swf, ffdec returned the code with stray "§§dup"s. I
have read similar issues about '§§' and understand that this is a temporary workaround,
but just for your information, and this simple function does not seem to be obfuscated.
ret.m = function(param1:Number):Number
I do not own the source code, but I speculate that the function should be something like:
The swf file contains manually obfuscated code (those unintelligible RegExps), but I think
'§§dup' is not used to obfuscate the code.
The file was named decoded because it was previously encrypted, and the file uploaded
should be standard swf with Actionscript 3.
By the way, moving the caret in p-code panel seem to point the caret to incorrect code in
the decompiled AS code panel.
Thank you for your wonderful decompiler!